Prashant Kishor (PK) entered Bihar with a promise of clean politics, local leadership and a break from both NDA and RJD. Although Jan Suraj did not win many seats, its presence significantly influenced voter psychology, especially anti-incumbency voters who were originally looking for an alternative to NDA.
Below is a detailed explanation of how this helped NDA in an unintentional but impactful way:
1. Anti-incumbency Voters First Moved Towards Jan Suraj
A large section of Bihar’s voters — especially youth and first-time voters — were unhappy with NDA due to issues like jobs, migration, local problems, corruption at lower levels, and inflation.
These voters normally shift to RJD, which is traditionally the main opposition.
But this time, Jan Suraj emerged as a “fresh, clean, independent” option.
- Young voters loved PK’s padyatra.
- Middle-class voters liked his talk of governance reforms.
- Educated voters felt PK was free from caste politics.
This created a split in the anti-NDA vote, reducing the intensity of anti-incumbency against NDA.
2. PK’s Constant Attack on RJD’s ‘Jungle Raj’ Image Strengthened NDA’s Narrative
NDA for years relied on one narrative:
“RJD = Jungle Raj; NDA = Stability.”
But NDA leaders saying it again and again had lost some effect.
When Prashant Kishor — an “independent reformist figure” — also started exposing:
- RJD’s alleged gunda elements
- Yadav muscle power networks
- Old Jungle Raj stories
- Social media threats issued by aggressive RJD supporters
- Illicit money, katta culture, booth intimidation
…it validated NDA’s claims from an unexpected voice.
This had two effects:
A. Middle class & women voters became scared of RJD’s return
PK’s attacks made people remember the 1990s atmosphere.
Fear overpowered anger.
B. NDA’s old narrative looked fresh again
When the same message came from PK instead of BJP, voters took it more seriously.
Thus PK unintentionally revived the NDA’s strongest electoral weapon.
3. RJD Supporters’ Aggressive Social Media Behaviour Backfired
During the campaign, many RJD supporters became highly aggressive online:
- Threatening language
- Caste abuses
- “Sarkar to hamari banegi, dekh lenge” type posts
- Street intimidation videos
- Open challenge to upper-caste and non-Yadav communities
PK’s team amplified these incidents during grassroots meetings.
This made voters feel:
- “RJD wapas aayega to phir wahi purana haal hoga.”
- “Better NDA than Jungle Raj 2.0”
Moderate, confused and silent voters — especially women, pasmanda Muslims, EBCs and general category youth — slowly shifted toward NDA.
4. When Voters Realized Jan Suraj Cannot Win, They Chose NDA Over RJD
As polling day got closer, ground reality became clearer:
- PK had strong candidates but not enough to form a government.
- Voters who liked PK’s ideas didn’t want to “waste their vote.”
- Many anti-NDA voters concluded:
“Jan Suraj is not winning this time.”
Now they had two remaining choices:
Option A: NDA
Stable, experienced, known governance.
Option B: RJD
Fear of jungle raj returning, uncertainty, and aggressive supporter behaviour.
Most neutral/anti-incumbent voters compared both and felt:
- “NDA mein problem hai, par RJD se behtar hai.”
- “PK abhi strong nahi, vote dene se RJD aa jayega.”
- “NDA ka vikalp PK hai, RJD nahi.”
Thus PK acted as a safety valve —
he drew the anti-NDA frustration away from RJD, but when voters saw he wasn’t forming the govt, they shifted to NDA as the “safer bet.”
5. Vote-Splitting Hurt RJD More Than NDA
This was the most direct impact.
- Seats where Jan Suraj got 15–40k votes would normally have gone to RJD.
- This made many close seats tilt in favor of NDA.
- NDA’s core vote remained united; RJD’s anti-NDA voters got divided.
Even if PK never intended it, this vote-cutting effect helped NDA win dozens of seats.
Final Summary
Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraj movement unintentionally helped NDA win Bihar by:
- Soaking up anti-NDA anger, reducing direct benefit to RJD.
- Reinforcing NDA’s Jungle Raj narrative through independent criticism of RJD.
- Exposing RJD’s gunda elements, social media aggression and katta culture.
- Making anti-NDA voters fear RJD more, pushing them towards NDA as a safer choice.
- Bringing in a third front that split votes in a way that weakened RJD, not NDA.
- Creating the belief that PK won’t win this time, leading voters to pick NDA over RJD.
In simple terms:
PK became the “buffer” that absorbed the anger against NDA and prevented RJD from fully capitalizing on it.
Leave a Reply